Solipsism Gradient

Rainer Brockerhoff’s blog

Browsing Posts published by Rainer Brockerhoff

Re: Quay vs. 10.5.2

No comments

As predictable, interest in Quay has flagged a little with the release of 10.5.2. To quote one comment:

…pointless… since 10.5.2 brings back the functionality.

Well, in a certain way, true; to the extent that, once Apple shipped TextEdit, it’s pointless to use other text editors; it’s free and edits text, right?

Well, not really. I’ve changed the Quay product page to explain:

So why should you use Quay at all? Extra information, more flexibility. For one, the Dock’s popups are limited to about 500 items; Quay’s limit is in the tens of thousands. You can have a Quay popup on both sides of the Dock; Apple has them only on the document size.

And some comparative screenshots (this one is for “Sort by Kind”, 10.5.2’s popup is on the right):

Let’s hope this makes my point.

Re: Quay vs. 10.5.2

No comments

Mac OS X 10.5.2 (9C31) came out yesterday and I’m running it now. Seems they declared it stable enough to release… icon_wink.gif

So I’m declaring 1.1b2 stable enough to release too. I’m just checking if everything’s still working and updating the documentation; expect a release later today.

If you’ve installed 10.5.2, you’ll see an extra menu item in Quay’s general preference popup (option-command-click on the Dock divider stripe), to make Quay act only on Stacks set to “List” view. Some other 10.5.2-only goodies will show up in the next (and hopefully, final) 1.1.

I’ve gotten a serious amount of feedback on this beta. Thanks to all of you who sent in bug reports and suggestions. It’s the first shareware I’ve written for a larger audience and I couldn’t have foreseen all those various operating conditions without this sort of feedback.

Re: Quay vs. 10.5.2

No comments

OK, Quay 1.1b1 is out. Get it here.

Thanks to all who’ve sent in bug reports and suggestions. Quay 1.1b2 (or 1.1 final, let’s hope) will be out in a week or so.

Re: Quay vs. 10.5.2

No comments

Over 20 days since my last post on the subject, and Quay 1.1 is still a few days from release! But, thankfully, so is Mac OS X 10.5.2… I suppose they, too, ran into some last-minute snags.

Well, at least I can confidently report that the feature set and the user interface – at least on the popup menu side, which is generated by the background application – is now stable, and it looks pretty good even if I say so myself. Here’s a screenshot:

Let’s explain details from the top down.

The first line of course reminds you of which icon you clicked on, which is useful as the name disappears as soon as you click on it – and it also informs you about how many items there are in that folder.

The second line tells you in what order the actual items below are sorted (with the black arrow indicating ascending or descending). You can select quite a lot of keys for sorting: by name, creation date, modification date, Finder label, file size, default application for that file, file kind, and lastly you can get the list unsorted – meaning the strict alphabetical order that items appear in the file directory.

Then we have the actual items, and at the end an extra item which allows you to show the contents of the folder in the Finder.

Notice that most lines have right-aligned, disabled comments; in the screenshot, only folder content counts are being shown, as indicated by the heading in the second line. In the interest of speed (more about that later) these counts are of all first-level items only. Notice that this may include invisible items, so at first glance the counts may look wrong if you elected not to show such items in the list below.

You may elect to show on each line the Finder label color (indicated by colored dots to the left), file size, creation date, modification date, file sizes or folder counts – and you can elect to always simply show the key that the list happens to be sorted by at that moment. Don’t worry, all these options work together to show you just the right amount of information without clutter. Ah, and the date displays use the “short form” you set in your International preference panel.

Moving down, notice the funny-shaped overlay over the icon in the Dock. While I could, at this stage, reproduce the little triangle at the bottom of the standard Dock menus, I opted for using a visually distinctive state to emphasize that these menus are NOT generated by the Dock, but by Quay – this distinction hasn’t been properly absorbed by some users in the past. The dark-to-light/transparent-to-opaque gradient has been carefully designed and tested to be visible over a wide range of desktop pictures and Dock themes. It also furnishes a convenient clicking target for closing the menu again.

Finally, on the bottom of the screenshot, notice that the Quay icon is way over on the left side of the Dock; among the applications, in fact. Yes, you can now have Quay icons on both sides of the Dock! But, you will ask, can I now drag files onto these icons, as everybody requested…? (Sharp-eyed observers will also notice the 4,294 unread items in my NetNewsWire icon -no time for reading!)

Well, yes and no. No, the old-style Quay icons, which are built by the old-style two-step method of dragging a folder to the Quay window, then to the Dock, still won’t accept drags – but you can have your cake and eat it too! Just look at this preference menu you get by option-command-clicking on the Dock divider strip:

Right, starting with this upcoming version 1.1, all Stacks you have in your Dock can automatically show Quay popup menus and continue to accept dragged-on files as Stacks do. Just don’t check “Never” on the preference menu. Of course, this also means the two-step drag is now obsolete.

Obsolete, that is, unless you want to change the icon’s appearance instead of having the jumbled-up contents graphic. Well, that isn’t possible yet – at least with this combination of Quay 1.1 and Mac OS X 10.5.1 – but let me reassure you that you’ll have a pleasant surprise when 10.5.2 comes out.

Quay 1.1 has been, as I’ve said in past posts, Yet Another Complete Rewrite. The old ‘fake-file-starting-a-background-app-when-clicking’ could no longer do what I wanted, and of course, anybody could do that, right? So now I went to a completely new method. All clicks work transparently just like they do on the standard Dock, only the Quay popups appear instead – and you even can momentarily get the standard Stack displays by option-clicking – but you usually won’t notice.

Neither does the Dock itself notice anything; I’m still not hacking the Dock itself. “No magic” is still the mantra here, although I must admit that in 1.1 there’s some pretty complex technology substituting for it – and while I’m still not using any private API for that, I also must admit that I had to depend on the Dock’s implementation details quite a bit.

There’s lots of extra little Quay quirks (sorry) I don’t have time to explain. This post is already too long. But why isn’t it out yet? Well, basically installation has been changed completely, so I now have to rewrite that too, and I still have to redo the main Quay application to account for the left-side Dock option, and of course there has to be a completely new help documentation too.

So please folks, hang on for a few more days and check this blog, or use Quay’s “check for updates” facility, soon.

Update: oops, forgot to talk about speed. Well, the popup is now really fast; you won’t notice any delay unless your folder has over 1,000 items, and even for that case it won’t take more than a couple of seconds. Trust me: fast.

Some more thoughts about the Air.

I finally saw the pertinent parts of the keynote and paid attention to the shots of the Air’s interior and of the main board. Wow, that thing is cramped; 2/3 of it is battery. There’ve been serious announcements of progress in battery technology and for the next years we can expect even slimmer machines and/or longer capacity; still, it seems that Apple now considers 5 hours (if real) as a good compromise between bulk/weight and battery life.

The Air no doubt makes use of Apple’s recent patent (sorry, no time to find a URL for it) for glueing together a precision-cast aluminum chassis – meaning very few internal mounting screws and posts, much tighter tolerances, and serious amounts of weight and dimensions shaved off, as well as better heat distribution. It also means that the case feels like a single unit; it’s significant that people who’ve handled the Air report that it feels very solid, not at all fragile like it looks. Especially the moveable port door is said to feel solidly reliable.

People calling for a removable battery no doubt are unaware that such a thing would mean a huge case opening, meaning extra ribbing elsewhere to counteract the rigidity loss, mounting screws and a good lock, what amounts to a double wall inside the unit when the battery is mounted, a pair of connectors and so forth. Meaning perhaps 200g extra in weight, 4mm in depth and $50 (at least) added to the bill of materials… all to accomodate maybe 10% of users who need an extra battery for flying tourist class?

I remember from my hardware design days how there are cascading design choices like this. Someone comes in and says “can’t we do such-and-such” and they fall off their chair when you explain the consequences. Another example is the much-bemoaned lack of peripheral ports. But consider FireWire. Yes, Apple pioneered FireWire and it’s a great technology… but check the power requirements:

…[it] can supply up to 45 watts of power per port at up to 30 volts…

That would be the entire 45W of the external power supply right there! Admittedly Apple’s other laptops already lower that to about half by supplying less voltage. For instance, the FireWire developer note says for MacBooks:

The MacBook’s six-pin FireWire connector provides unregulated 9 V to 12 V power with a maximum load of 0.75 A. Developers should design to use 7 W sustained power, or less.

Contrast this to the new MacPro, which can supply 18W per port (28W total on all four ports), and you see how laptop power design considerations are important. Supplying 0.75A to get the standard 7W on a FireWire connector would have meant larger board traces, probably a thicker board, an extra power supply chip for the higher voltage, extra dissipation, cooling… not worth it. Lowering that requirement to 5W or less would mean many external drives not working properly.

The same reasoning applies to USB. A standard USB port must supply 0.5A continuously at 5V – 2.5W. The new MacPro and the latest revisions of the laptops (including the Air) support a special high-power mode where one port can supply 1.1A (5.5W). This was meant originally to allow the keyboard to work as a powered hub, supplying the regular 0.5A on each of its ports. The Air probably needs it for its external DVD drive, although the USB Developer Note says this only works for the keyboard – and supposedly the Air’s external drive doesn’t work on other Macs. Time will tell, but here too an extra USB port would have meant beefing up the machine, though not as much as a FireWire port would have.

Somewhat more puzzling is the limitation of the 80GB 1.8″ drive, as there are larger drives sold in iPods. Either Apple is already supply-constrained for those, or the slight differences in thickness and power consumption are significant; in any event, I expect the Air’s next revision to offer larger drives. Same for RAM; coming back to the pictures of the main board, notice there’s no space for extra RAM chips, meaning that 4GB will only be possible when the next chip series doubles capacity. (And a RAM socket? With a door? Forget it.)

Finally, all this is a great opportunity for acessory makers; expect a 4-port USB hub (powered, of course) with built-in gigabit Ethernet and media slots, for instance. Even for Apple itself, it might be interesting if Time Capsule allowed a plug-in DVD drive for remote access; it would just mean a firmware update, but I suppose the Air’s drive would be too much for the Capsule’s power supply.

Posted by shudder to think:
shudder to think wrote

Bookmarked your post over at Blog Bookmarker.com!

Aargh

No comments

The Commonly Confused Words Test: here’s my result:

Your Score: English Genius

You scored 100% Beginner, 100% Intermediate, 100% Advanced, and 86% Expert!

You did so extremely well, even I can’t find a word to describe your excellence! You have the uncommon intelligence necessary to understand things that most people don’t. You have an extensive vocabulary, and you’re not afraid to use it properly! Way to go!

Dang. I must check why I didn’t get a 100% expert! This is intolerable!

Posted by kiltbear:

Rainer Brockerhoff wrote:

wouldn’t such a “normal person” be equally well served by a MacBook, at less cost? Not that I remember what such a person is like… icon_biggrin.gif

Ah, yes, well that is the same issue as the difference between a Toyota and a Lexus, no?

Photos licensed by Creative Commons license. Unless otherwise noted, content © 2002-2024 by Rainer Brockerhoff. Iravan child theme by Rainer Brockerhoff, based on Arjuna-X, a WordPress Theme by SRS Solutions. jQuery UI based on Aristo.