{"id":2346,"date":"2003-03-06T11:55:24","date_gmt":"2003-03-06T14:55:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/bb\/viewtopic.php?p=322"},"modified":"2010-05-09T10:07:36","modified_gmt":"2010-05-09T13:07:36","slug":"re-things-to-ponder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/2003\/03\/06\/re-things-to-ponder\/","title":{"rendered":"Re: Things to ponder"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M. at the excellent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.d351gn.com\/whuffie\/\">Whuffie website<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.d351gn.com\/whuffie\/2003_03_02_whuffive.htm#90411750\">comments<\/a> on my recent post:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Following a trackback, I found this post by mac software developer Rainer Brockerhoff&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>It appears that he sees links as a form of Whuffie, &#8220;hey &#8216;huckleberry thats a mighty large blogroll your hefting theya&#8221;. His large list of links gets him a ranking of 108th most prolific linkers at The Blogging Ecosystem.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;To borrow from wordsmith Tim Oren at Due Diligence : I am not sure if blogrolls are &#8220;fungible&#8221;. Meaning it is not a goods or commodities that is freely exchangeable. Really anyone could just take an entire top 500 (of 101,617) links and blogroll them onto a page. This would likely build some traffic.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I hasten to add that my primary intent in publishing my blogroll wasn&#8217;t to attract traffic as such; after all, it&#8217;s the actual list of feeds I&#8217;m reading, and therefore of interest to whoever analyses such connections.. When I said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In the neverending quest for whuffie&#8230; I was checking who&#8217;s linking to me&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>this was partly tongue-in-cheek. Appearing on someone&#8217;s blogroll is of course flattering <em>per se<\/em>; readers are always welcome. But of course current link-counting schemes such as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/\">TechnoRati<\/a> don&#8217;t yet map accurately to real Whuffie.<\/p>\n<p>M. goes on to say:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But to me when I scope a blogs &#8216;linkum, I expect it to have some relevance to the content. I especially like when they categorize or define the hyperlinks. My blogroll is a small list of blogs that I regularly visit and that seem to share some of the interests that I have.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;While, I try not to blog about blogging as too many sites exercise this masturbatory behavior, I think the idea of social networking and it&#8217;s complex application in the blogosphere is worthy of study. Check out <a href=\"http:\/\/radio.weblogs.com\/0114726\/2003\/02\/12.html#a284\">this cool graph<\/a> and indepth study from Ross Mayfield&#8217;s Blog.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Although my <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ranchero.com\/netnewswire\/\">NetNewsWire<\/a> subscription list uses groups to further categorize the subscriptions, unfortunately this is not reflected in the exported .opml file, which I&#8217;m mechanically converting to the form seen on the left. It would be very interesting to define standard keywords to add such value judgments to .opml files, and have everybody&#8217;s site reference those files in a &lt;link&gt; tag.<\/p>\n<p>Ross Mayfield&#8217;s article is indeed very interesting and I had skimmed it (and <a href=\"http:\/\/radio.weblogs.com\/0114726\/2003\/02\/06.html#a277\">some<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/radio.weblogs.com\/0114726\/2003\/02\/10.html#a281\">related<\/a> ones) previously when the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shirky.com\/writings\/powerlaw_weblog.html\">&#8220;power law&#8221;<\/a> discussion came up. He says that &#8220;not all links are created equal&#8221;. I agree; first of all, blogroll links are more valuable than casual one-off references, as they represent people who read me every day. Also if someone whose weblog I read regularly, and whose opinions I respect, links to me, I feel more flattered than if it&#8217;s some random unknown&#8230; and of course, a casual link may even express disapproval of whatever I wrote, which should count as negative, not positive, Whuffie.<\/p>\n<p>If I understand Mayfield&#8217;s articles correctly, he&#8217;s saying that simple non-weighted link counts chart &#8220;political networks&#8221;, which have power-law behavior. On the other hand, if links are weighted to properly show the make-up of &#8220;social networks&#8221;, a bell-curve distribution should show up, with a maximum network size of <a href=\"http:\/\/radio.weblogs.com\/0114726\/2003\/01\/29.html#a253\">150 people<\/a> (that being, supposedly, the maximum number of people one can interact with on a daily basis without frying one&#8217;s neurons). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.megnut.com\/weblogs\/002581.asp\">Meg<\/a> speculates that weblogging tools may possibly help us to go beyond the 150-person limit. Perhaps not-so-coincidentally, 150 people were invited to <a href=\"http:\/\/joi.ito.com\/\">Joi Ito<\/a>&#8216;s recent weblog party, and he <a href=\"http:\/\/joi.ito.com\/archives\/2003\/03\/04\/making_room_for_more_new_friends.html\">rebuilt his blogroll<\/a> afterwards to reflect that.<\/p>\n<p>The whole Whuffie, group-forming, reputation-rating, community-forming, socializing-at-a-distance thing is fascinating. Writing this post yielded dozens of interesting references, which I&#8217;ll read and analyze later&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M. at the excellent Whuffie website comments on my recent post: Following a trackback, I found this post by mac software developer Rainer Brockerhoff&#8230; It appears that he sees links as a form of Whuffie, &#8220;hey &#8216;huckleberry thats a mighty large blogroll your hefting theya&#8221;. His large list of links gets him a ranking of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-meta"],"featured_image_src":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Rainer Brockerhoff","author_link":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/author\/rbrockerhoff\/"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1q3Zc-BQ","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2346\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}