{"id":1466,"date":"2009-01-07T11:03:31","date_gmt":"2009-01-07T14:03:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/bb\/viewtopic.php?p=2627"},"modified":"2011-05-15T22:29:05","modified_gmt":"2011-05-16T01:29:05","slug":"re-more-tradeoffs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/2009\/01\/07\/re-more-tradeoffs\/","title":{"rendered":"Re: More tradeoffs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While most of yesterday&#8217;s Macworld keynote was uninteresting to me personally &#8211; I rarely use any of the updated software, and don&#8217;t have iTunes store access &#8211; the new 17&#8243; MacBook Pro was <a href=\"\/bb\/viewtopic.php?p=2557#255\">mostly as I expected<\/a>: the additional space was used for a larger battery, and more USB ports.<\/p>\n<p>It was gratifying to see Apple&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apple.com\/macbookpro\/17inch-battery\/\">battery page<\/a> practically repeat my reasoning about the infrastructure (and wasted space) needed to accommodate removable batteries. (See also <a href=\"http:\/\/chuqui.typepad.com\/chuqui_30\/2009\/01\/cue-the-complaints-17-inch-macbook-pro-without-a-removable-battery-venturebeat.html\">Chuq Von Rospach<\/a>&#8216;s discussion of the issue.) Not that the 15&#8243; model&#8217;s infrastructure is quite as large as they show in the video, of course&#8230; but it makes the point well.<\/p>\n<p>Judging from the pictures, the hard drive is inside a space that&#8217;s almost exactly square. In theory, they could have rotated the drive 90 degrees and made the battery 30mm wider, for maybe 10% more capacity. So why didn&#8217;t they do that? It would have meant extra weight, a beefed-up charging circuit, more heat dissipation, and either a larger power supply (which already is at 85W) or a longer charging time.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that we&#8217;ll see incremental upgrades for iMacs and Mac minis rolled out without much fanfare over the next two months. My tip for the iMacs is that they&#8217;ll use the exact same front and back bezels as the corresponding-sized displays, with only a 10mm shim module inserted to accommodate the CPU and drives. The advantage, of course, would be that you could add a second display to your iMac with the exact same styling, screen parameters, and height; a good selling point. It would be a no-brainer for the 24&#8243; model. I&#8217;m not sure that a 20&#8243; display from Apple would sell well by itself, but if it used bezels and nearly all components from the 20&#8243; iMac, it might be price competitive, and the styling advantage would be worth paying a few bucks extra. A 28&#8243; iMac has been rumored; would that, then, mean that the current high-end 30&#8243; display would be shrunk to 28&#8243; too? I hope we&#8217;ll have the answer soon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While most of yesterday&#8217;s Macworld keynote was uninteresting to me personally &#8211; I rarely use any of the updated software, and don&#8217;t have iTunes store access &#8211; the new 17&#8243; MacBook Pro was mostly as I expected: the additional space was used for a larger battery, and more USB ports. It was gratifying to see [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[3,16],"tags":[23],"class_list":["post-1466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apple","category-hardware","tag-mac"],"featured_image_src":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Rainer Brockerhoff","author_link":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/author\/rbrockerhoff\/"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1q3Zc-nE","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1466\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brockerhoff.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}